Language Legislation Archives



2002

November 5: Unz Initiatives Pass in Massachusetts, Fail in Colorado

April 2: Petition for English-Only Initiative Struck Down by Oklahoma Supreme Court

March 26: Alaska English-Only Law Ruled Unconstitutional

March 1: Iowa Governor Signs Official English into Law

January 8: Bush Signs H.R. 1, Repealing Bilingual Education Act


2000

November 7: English Only Initiatives Pass in Arizona and Utah

July 10: Proposed English Only Measure Invalidatd by Colorado Supreme Court

Oklahoma Official English Petition Fails to Qualify for Ballot

State Language Legislation, 2000 Session

1999

May 19: Clinton Administration Unveils Its Education Proposals for the Reauthorization of Title VII and Title I;
Legislation and Section-by Section Analysis

March 3: Judge Puts Alaska English-Only Law on Hold

January 11: Appeal in Arizona's English-Only Case
Denied by U.S. Supreme Court

January 6: Unz Launches Anti-Bilingual Initiative in Arizona

State Language Legislation, 1999 Session
 

1998

November 3: Alaska Voters Adopt English-Only Law

October 17: Congress Gives Bilingual Education A Raise

September 10: House Passes Riggs BillH.R. 3892 would effectively repeal the Bilingual Education Act

June 11: Missouri Enacts Official English Law

June 4: House Committee Votes To Gut Bilingual Ed.

June 2: California Voters Approve Anti-Bilingual Prop. 227

April 28: Arizona's English-Only Amendment Ruled Unconstitutional


108th Congress (2003-04)

  • H.R. 300 (King - NY) – Bill to repeal Executive Order 13166, issued by President Clinton to ensure that federal agencies accommodate the needs of limited-English speakers; referred to Committee on Government Reform
  • H.R. 931 (King - NY) – "National Language Act"; would also repeal the Bilingual Education Act; referred to Education & Workforce and Judiciary Committees
  • H.R. 997 (King - IA) – "English Language Unity Act"; similar to HR 123, the federal Official English measure that passed the House in 1996 but failed in the Senate; referred to Education & Workforce and Judiciary Committees
  • H. Con. Res. 5 (Serrano) – English Plus resolution; a nonbinding policy statement in opposition to English Only measures; referred to the Subcommittee on Education Reform

 

107th Congress (2001-2002)
  • H.R. 280 (King) – "National Language Act"; would also repeal the Bilingual Education Act; referred to Education & Workforce and Judiciary Committees
  • H.R. 1984 (Barr) – "English Language Unity Act"; would also stiffen English literacy requirements for naturalization as a U.S. citizen
  • H.J. Res. 16 (Doolittle) – Constitutional English Language Amendment; referred to Judiciary Committee
  • H. Con. Res. 9 (Serrano) – English Plus resolution; a nonbinding policy statement in opposition to English Only measures; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
  • H.R. 969 (Stump) – Would overrule President Clinton's Executive Order 13166, "Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency"
  • H.R. 1 (Boehner) – "No Child Left Behind Act"; closely parallels Bush proposal for elementary and secondary education; PASSED BY HOUSE, 5/23/01; SIGNED INTO LAW, WITH AMENDMENTS, 1/8/02, repealing Bilingual Education Act.
  • S. 1 (Jeffords) – "Better Education for Students and Teachers Act"; departs from Bush proposal, largely keeps Bilingual Education Act intact; PASSED BY SENATE, 6/14/01

106th Congress (1999-2000)

  • H. R. 123 (Barr) – "Bill Emerson English Language Empowerment Act"; the lead version of English Only legislation; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
  • H.J. Res. 21 (Doolittle) – Constitutional English Language Amendment; referred to Judiciary Committee
  • H.R. 50 (Stump) – "Declaration of Official Language Act of 1999"; would also repeal the Bilingual Education Act; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
  • H.R. 1005 (King) – "National Language Act of 1999"; would also repeal the Bilingual Education Act; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
  • H. Con. Res. 4 (Serrano) – English Plus resolution; a nonbinding policy statement in opposition to English Only measures; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
  • S. 667 (McCain) – English Plus policy statement as part of a private-school "choice" bill; would also authorize a study of Americans' multilingual proficiencies; referred to Finance Committee
105th Congress (1997-98)
  • S. Res. 236 (McCain) – Nonbinding "sense of the Senate" resolution endorsing English Plus; 9 Republican cosposors; 5/22/98 press release.
  • H.R. 3720 (DeLay) – Would repeal the Bilingual Education Act and eliminate the federal Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs; would also void Lau consent decrees requiring bilingual instruction.
  • H.R. 3892 (Riggs)– English Language Fluency Act (successor to H.R. 3680); would turn Title VII into a state-administered formula grant for school programs designed to teach English within two years and void Lau consent decrees requiring bilingual instruction. PASSED EDUCATION & WORKFORCE COMMITTEE, 6/3/98; Committee Report on H.R. 3892; PASSED HOUSE, 9/10/98
  • H. R. 123 (Cunningham) – "Bill Emerson English Language Empowerment Act"; the lead version of English Only legislation; 165 cosponsors; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
  • S. 323 (Shelby) – Similar to H.R. 123; 21 cosponsors; referred to Governmental Affairs Committee
  • H. R. 622 (Stump) – "Declaration of Official Language Act"; parallels H.R. 123 but with fewer exceptions to the English Only mandate; also would repeal the bilingual provisions of the Voting Rights Act; 38 cosponsors; referred to Education & Workforce and Judiciary committees
  • H.R. 1005 (King) – "National Language Act"; a more restrictive English Only measure that would repeal the Bilingual Education Act and make schools return unspent grant funds; 24 cosponsors; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
  • H. J. Res. 37 (Doolittle) – Constitutional English Language amendment; 3 cosponsors; referred to Judiciary Committee
  • H. Con. Res. 4 (Serrano) – English Plus resolution; a nonbinding policy statement in opposition to English Only measures; 37 cosponsors; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
  • H. Res. 28 (King) – Nonbinding resolution disapproving of the use of federal funds for school programs that recognize "Ebonics"; 7 cosponsors; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
  • H. R. 856 (Young) – Puerto Rico plebiscite bill includes Official English provisions for statehood; passed Resources Committee, 44-1, 5/21/97; discharged by Rules Committee and placed on House calendar, 7/11/97; APPROVED BY HOUSE, 209-208, WITH AMENDMENTS, 3/4/98
  • H. R. 1203 (Stump) – Prohibits the use of federal education funds to "promote the teaching or use of regional or group dialects" – e.g., African American Vernacular English; 128 cosponsors; referred to Education & Workforce Committee
104th Congress (1995-96)
  • H. R. 123 (Emerson)Federal English Only bill, passed by the House of Representatives, August 1, 1996
  • H. R. 739 (Roth) – "Declaration of Official Language Act"; a more draconian version of the Emerson bill
  • H. R. 1005 (King) – An even more restrictive "National Language Act" 
  • S. 356 (Shelby) – Companion to the Emerson bill; text is identical to H.R. 123, as originally introduced
102d Congress (1991-92)
  • H. R. 123 (Emerson) – First version of "Language of Government" legislation, introduced January 3, 1991
97th Congress (1981-82)
  • S. J. Res. 72 (Hayakawa) – A constitutional English Language Amendment; the first Official English bill ever introduced in Congress, April 27, 1981

State Language Legislation – 2001-2002

  • Colorado – Anti-bilingual initiative; FAILED, 44% - 56%, 11/5/02 
  • Iowa – Official English; ENACTED, 3/1/02
  • Massachusetts – Anti-bilingual initiative;  PASSED, 68% - 32%, 11/5/02
  • New York – Official English
  • Oklahoma – Petition for English-only ballot initiative ruled unconstitutional 
  • Oregon – Anti-bilingual education bill

State Language Legislation – 2000
  • Arizona – Anti-bilingual-education initiative; PASSES 11/07/00
  • Colorado – Anti-bilingual-education initiative; INVALIDATED by Colorado Supreme Court
  • Iowa – Official English
  • Maine – Official English
  • Massachusetts – Official English
  • New York – Official English
  • Ohio – Official English
  • Oklahoma – Official English initiative; FAILS TO BE CERTIFIED FOR BALLOT
  • Utah – Official English initiative; PASSES 11/07/00



State Language Legislation – 1999

  • Arizona – Bilingual education reform; anti-bilingual initiative
  • Connecticut – Official English
  • Iowa – Official English; DEFEATED
  • Maine – Official English
  • Massachusetts – Official English
  • New York – Official English
  • Ohio – Official English
  • Utah – Official English; English Plus



State Language Legislation – 1997-98